Written by Benny L. Kass
The general public often confuses condominiums with cooperatives. In reality, as far as living standards go, there are few differences. However, from a legal — and financing — point of view, there are major differences.
If you own a condominium, you actually own your entire apartment, as well as a percentage of the common areas (called the “common elements”). A cooperative owner, on the other hand, does not, in fact, own the unit.
The cooperative association, which is usually a corporation consisting of all the unit owners, owns the entire building, including all of the individual units. Each co-op unit owner either owns shares in the cooperative association — just like owning shares in any other corporation — or for non-stock corporations has what is known as a “proprietary lease”. This lease spells out the rights and responsibilities of the owner, as well as the obligations and duties of the Association.
Decisions on the management, lifestyle and financial details are made by the cooperative unit members themselves, either through their vote at regularly scheduled meetings, or by delegation to an elected board of directors, which runs the day-to-day operations of the cooperative.
While this may sound complex, in reality cooperative living can be very desirable. Cooperative residents generally get the same tax treatment as other homeowners. If they have a loan and if it is secured by their ownership documents (ie. the stock certificate or the proprietary lease), they can deduct the yearly interest paid on that loan. Additionally, if the cooperative association has a mortgage on the entire building — called a blanket or underlying mortgage — shareholders can deduct their proportionate share of the interest on that mortgage. And under most circumstances they can also deduct their proportionate share of the real estate taxes which the cooperative pays. It gets a little complicated if there are commercial units in the complex.
Perhaps the most important distinction between a condominium and a cooperative is that most cooperative associations require the prospective purchaser be approved by a membership committee comprised of current cooperative owners. The approval process allows the committee to approve or reject a potential purchaser. However, there are only two grounds on which rejection can legally be based: financial or unwillingness to abide by the terms of the association’s rules and regulations. If the membership committee believes that the potential purchaser does not have the financial capacity to live in the complex — or if the committee determines that the potential purchaser has demonstrated an unwillingness or an inability to comply with the operating rules — that potential purchaser may be rejected for ownership. However, under no circumstances can the applicant be rejected for other reasons, such as age, sex, race, sexual preference or religion.
The two classic cases in history involve Richard Nixon and Barbra Streisand — both of whom were rejected for membership in New York cooperatives. The membership committees of those cooperatives were concerned that the presence of these celebrities would create havoc within the cooperative, and would make their building a tourist attraction.
Until the mid-1980’s, it was difficult to obtain financing for the purchase of a cooperative apartment. Thus, sellers often had to “take back” some of the purchase price, by way of a promissory note. As security for this promissory note, the new owners would pledge the shares of stock (or proprietary lease) which they received at settlement.
In recent years, however, cooperative financing is freely available, and is referred to as “share loan financing.” Indeed, there even is a little competition among lenders who are interested in making such loans.
There are many cooperative apartments all over the United States, although they are principally found in major metropolitan areas, such as New York, Washington, D.C., Chicago and Los Angeles. One interesting aspect of cooperative living is the very active participation in the management of the cooperative by the co-op members. It is this participation — indeed a spirit of involvement — that has kept cooperatives alive and well, and a competing force to condominium living.
There are those who claim that cooperatives are not as good investments as condominiums, and indeed some cooperative associations have changed to condominium. This columnist cannot accept such a general claim. There are many condominiums which are financially unsound and are just not good investments. Much depends on the individual project: how is it managed? Is the Board actively involved and does the Board have the expertise to run such a project? What is the financial state of the association? Does the Board allow delinquencies to mount or have they adopted a “zero tolerance” approach to collections?
These, and many other factors, must be considered — both for condominium as well as cooperatives. Potential purchasers must do their homework, review carefully the legal documents and the financial statements, before they sign any contract to purchase.