Why You Should Just Say No to FSBO

WRITTEN BY JAYMI NACIRIWhy You Should Just Say No to FSBO

There was a lively conversation on our neighborhood Nextdoor last week from someone who was listing his home for sale by owner (FSBO) and wanted to get the word out to neighbors but definitely did NOT want to attract the attention of real estate agents. He had a few choice words for agents around what he considered to be their unreasonable commission for “the easy job of sticking a sign outside.”

Well there’s an oversimplification. While we await a follow-up sometime NEVER saying the home has been sold, without a Realtor and for asking price, we thought it was a good time to examine again why it’s not a good idea to try to sell your own home. It just so happens that the National Association of Realtors’ (NAR) 2018 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers was just released, and their data further supports this claim.
Data from the report shows:

The number of homes sold by owner decreased in 2018 to “the lowest share recorded since this report started in 1981.” Just seven percent of home sales were logged as an FSBO. This is likely due to: fewer homes being listed FSBO overall; and homes listed FSBO not selling and ending up, ultimately, with agent representation.

“The median age for FSBO sellers is 55 years.” Could this be a factor of people thinking they have enough life experience and knowledge to play real estate agent?

“Seventy-one percent of FSBO sales were by married couples that have a median household income of $98,800.” Regardless of marital status or income, it’s not a stretch to say that those who opt to try to sell their own home are doing so to try to save some money.

However, “FSBOs typically sell for less than the selling price of other homes; FSBO homes sold at a median of $200,000 last year (up from $190,000 the year prior), and significantly lower than the median of agent-assisted homes at $264,900.” While it’s not possible to make a straight-up comparison between the $200,000 and $264,900 number, that is a GLARING difference.

The report also showed that among the “most difficult tasks for FSBO sellers” were “getting the right price,” at 17%.” This makes sense considering agents have access to comparables, historical data, and a network of other real estate professionals to provide pricing counsel and context, whereas sellers have…Zillow.

melting-watch

MARKET WATCH

Single Family Home Activity in the Antelope Valley

In the last 24 hours
02/15/19

New Listings …  23
Sold …  12
Pending …  14
Expd/Wthd/Cancld …  07
Price Increases …  01
Price Reductions …  10
Number of listings* …  1467
Average Days on Market …  100
Short sale/pay listings …  16
Equity listings …  1316
Bank owned listings …  23
HUD, Corp, Probate and Auction listings …  56
Days of inventory (at the average rate**) …  36.33
Days of inventory (at yesterdays rate**) …  77.21
Actual Number of days of inventory***  …  ∞

View the last 8+ years of data HERE!

 

* Count includes all ACTIVE and CONTINGENT MLS listings
** Assuming no future growth or reduction
*** At yesterdays depletion rate (∞ indicates negative depletion,
inventory would not be depleted at this sales rate)
ALL DATA WAS DERIVED FROM THE “GREATER ANTELOPE VALLEY
ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®” AND IS DEEMED RELIABLE.
THE CALCULATIONS OF THAT DATA IS THE
RESPONSIBILITY OF DON GOCKEL, REALTOR®

Why Exchange Real Property?

WRITTEN BY Why Exchange Real Property?

In the 1980’s (remember the 80’s? ERTA 1981 and TRA 1986), I was involved in quite a few Tax Deferred Exchanges and put the following together for investor clients and students.

Pre-Tax Power

Why exchange real property? To save taxes, yes, but said more succinctly, to build your estate with pre-tax dollars. Using proper exchange techniques will result in what is effectively interest-free money from the government. Taxes you owe can be paid later, allowing you the use of that money today to buy more or more expensive investment property. Other reasons to exchange include:

• Increasing depreciable basis by acquiring property encumbered with a larger debt.

• Acquiring sheltered income by exchanging for unimproved land for improved property.

• Acquiring property without cash, when sales may be impossible.

• Consolidating assets by exchanging many properties for one larger property.

• Receiving nontaxable cash by exchanging and refinancing after and independent of the exchange.

Diversifying Holdings Without Tax Consequence

Example of how not paying the taxes will allow you to build your estate faster:

If you acquired an investment property for $50,000 and sold it for $150,000, you would have a $100,000 capital gain (that is not including the gain you would realize because of depreciation is taken during the holding period of the property, which lowers the basis and results in higher realized gain). After taxes (30% for example, state and federal), you would end up with $70,000 to do what you like with, but let’s assume you will use it as a down payment in another property.

Example

Sell $150,000
Buy $ 50,000
Gain $100,000
Tax Bracket 30%
Tax $ 30,000
Balance to invest: $70,000

Breaking Down the Numbers

Taking that $70,000 and leveraging it 4 to 1 would result in a purchase of a $280,000 property. 10% annual appreciation in year one would result in an equity increase of $28,000 you structured the sale by section 1031 and did not have to pay the taxes at the time of the disposition of the first property (exchanging it instead of selling it), you could invest the entire $100,000. Leveraged at the same 4 to 1 ratio would allow you to purchase a $400,000 property. At the same 10% rate of appreciation, your increase in equity in year one would result in a $40,000 increase in equity. Multiply this added $12,000 equity buildup over a 20-year investment horizon and the result is substantial.

Internal Revenue Code Section 1031 says no gain or loss shall be recognized (taxed) if property held for investment is exchanged solely for a property of like kind to be held either for:

• Production of income

• Investment

• Productive use in trade or business

A property must be of “like-kind.” This means real property for real property, personal property for personal property. “Like-kind” is broadly defined, that is, all real estate qualifies regardless of the “grade or quality.” It is the “nature or character” of the property (realty or personalty) and not the name of the improvements (office building, apartment, hotel, etc.) that determines “like-kind”. This was emphasized in Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Chrichton.

This case involved the exchange of mineral interests and improved real property. The mineral interests were held to be like-kind property because under state law they were considered real property. In a subsequent revenue ruling, the IRS indicated that water rights also met the like kind test.

Property not Qualifying:

• Stock in trade

• Partnership interests

• Stocks, bonds, notes

• Dealer property

Multiple Properties

Nothing in Section 1031 prevents a taxpayer from exchanging out of or into multiple properties.

Tax Consequences Exchanges can be fully deferred or partially deferred. Any unlike kind property received in the exchange is considered boot and is recognized (taxable) in the year of the exchange. Boot is:

• Cash or the equivalent of cash

• Any unlike kind property

• Mortgage relief

• Any combination of the above

Cash paid offsets mortgage relief boot. The lower of the gain or the boot is taxable in the year of the exchange. For a completely tax-deferred exchange, you must trade up in equity, value, and loan.

Basis of Property Received

This is referred to as substitute basis and is the Fair Market Value of the property received minus the deferred gain (or plus any deferred loss).

The Exchange Process

As it is in any real estate transaction, you must first identify the objectives of the property owner. What do they want to accomplish?

Management problems, lack of control, cash flow, tax concerns; sometimes the owner is not sure of all the circumstances, and it may take some time and counseling to make the determination. A basic requirement is that all participants receive the same value that they give. The result should be that there are as many winners as there are participants. Determination of value to the participants in a real estate exchange is not complete without considering the improvement the transaction will make in the owner’s life. The analysis must take into consideration the personal circumstances of the participant’s lives.

Two-Party Exchange

As mentioned before, to structure a completely tax-deferred exchange, the investor must acquire property (properties) with equal or greater equity and larger fair market value than the property transferred (up in equity and value). This assumes that there is gain realized and that the taxpayer pays boot and assumes a larger loan. The very common three-party exchange is comprised of a sale and an exchange, or an exchange and a sale.